Manungso Lawas

Analysis human remains

1] Estimating subadult (<18yrs) age from the dentition
# Tooth development is more closely associated with chronological age than is development of most other skeletal parts and it seems to be under tighter genetic control (White and Folken 1991:310)
# Sex-based variation in development and eruption of teeth is most apparent at the canine position, and this tooth should be afforded less attention [sebaiknya diabaikan] when aging eruption dentitions (White and Folken 1991:311)
# When assessing the age of a subadult individual based on dentition, note all aspects of development, including the completeness of all crowns and roots (formation) and the place of each tooth relative to the alveolar margin (eruption) (White and Folken 1991:311)

2] Estimating adult (+18yrs) age from the dentition
# Once a permanent tooth erupts, it begins to wear. If the rate of wear within a population is fairly homogeneous, it follows that the extent [tk, luasx] of wear is a function of age. This fact can be used in assigning dental ages to adult specimens (White and Folken 1991:311)
# Rate and patterns of wear are governed by tooth developmental sequences, tooth morphology, tooth size, internal crown structure, tooth angulation, nondietary tooth use, the biomechanics of chewing and diet (McKee and Molnar 1988 in White and Folken 1991:311)
# The first step in assesing age by dentition is the application of seriation of all dentitions based on development and wear. Miles (1963) was the first to establish a scale of attrition based on development (White and Folken 1991:311)
# Lovejoy (1985 in White and Folken 1991:311) found, on the populational level, that dental wear was very regular in form and rate. As Lovejoy notes, the assessment of a single individual in a forensic setting based on dental wear allows only a gross approximation of age, but if an entire biologica; population is seriated, tooth wear can yield precise result.

3] Estimating adult age from cranial sutute closure
# It has been appreciated since the 1500s that sutures between various cranial bones fuse progressively as the individual ages (White and Folken 1991:313)
# One cranial feature, the sphenooccipital synchondrosis, is particularly useful in aging isolated crania because at least 95% of all individuals have fusion here between 20 and 25 yrs of age, with a central tendency at 23 yrs of age (Krogman and Iscan 1986 in White and Folken 1991:313)

4] Estimating adult age from the pubic symphysis surface
# One of the most widely used indicators of age at death has been metamorphosis of the symphyseal surface of the pubis of the os coxae (White and Folken 1991:315)
# The young adult human pubic symphysis has a rugged surface traversed by horizontal ridges and intervening grooves. This surface loses relief with age and is bounded by a rim by age 35. Subsequent erosion and general deterioration of the surface are progressive changes after this age (White and Folken 1991:315)
# Age-related chnages at the pubic symphysis have been recognized for many yeras and a formal system for using these changes to determine age was developed by Todd (1920 in White and Folken 1991:315)

5] Estimating adult age from the ilium’s auricular surface
# Lovejoy (1985b in White and Folken 1991:318) examined the auricular surface of the os coxae as a possible site of regular change corresponding to age in the Hamann-Todd collection.
# Lovejoy and colleagues describe age-related changes in surface granulation, microporosity, macroporosity, transverse organization, billowing and striations that are somewhat similar to those described for the surface of the pubic symphysis (White and Folken 1991:318)

1] Subadult (18yrs)
# Females have a longer pubic portion of the hip bone (Fig 128a). Therefore, the subpubic angle is greater in females (Fig 128b). As “rule of thumb” when the index finger is held perpendicular to the pubic symphysis the thumb can be moved only slightly, if at all, on a male innominate, but has ample room for movement on a female innominate (Fig 128c) (Bass 1987:131)

[1ramadhan1433H (20jul12J)]
Sex estimation
1> Supraorbital region is more prominent in males than in females
2> Supraorbital border (upper edge of the eye orbit) is sharp in females & blunt in males
3> Frontal sinuses are larger in males
[catatan 19 December 2003J]

^^ Dental development
^^ Dental wear score
^^ Human tooth
^^ Minatogawa
^^ Tana skull
^^ Perak man
^^ Pawon man
^^ Dental wear
^^ Pelvis


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s